Skip to content
Halloween 2026Explore the community map

Statewide Election

Outside PACs Spend Record $6M+ in California Insurance Chief Race

Despite pledges from both Democratic candidates to reject insurance industry money, campaign finance filings show industry dollars flowing through independent expenditure committees.

By Bay Area Chronicle · Syndicated from Danville Times
Syndicated reporting from Danville Times · Danville Times
Published · 2 min read

White neoclassical dome of the California State Capitol in Sacramento framed by autumn trees
Outside political action committees have spent more than $6 million in the Nov. 3 race for California insurance commissioner between state Sen. Ben Allen and former San Francisco Supervisor Jane Kim.
Your listening Queue & catch up
Unheard stories first, timed at 1×. Your selections stay first.

Add a story or build a catch-up queue to start listening.

As California voters prepare to choose a new state insurance commissioner on Nov. 3 amid ongoing home insurance nonrenewals and rising premiums, outside political action committees have poured a record $6 million-plus into the contest between two Democrats: state Sen. Ben Allen and former San Francisco Supervisor Jane Kim, CalMatters reported.

Both candidates pledged during their campaigns not to accept direct contributions from the insurance industry. However, state campaign finance records reviewed by CalMatters show that Allen's campaign accepted three maximum $10,000 contributions from bail bond insurers, $9,500 from another bail-connected entity, and $48,000 from a health insurance political action committee. Allen spokesperson Catie Stewart said the campaign subsequently pledged to return the bail-related contributions and noted that the insurance commissioner exercises limited regulatory authority over health insurers compared with property and casualty carriers.

$3.2 Million Backing Allen vs. $958,000 Backing Kim

The larger financial gulf has emerged in outside independent expenditure committees, which are legally barred from coordinating directly with candidates. Independent committees have spent roughly $3.2 million supporting Allen and $1.5 million opposing Kim, while labor and progressive groups led by the California Working Families Party have spent more than $958,000 supporting Kim.

One major pro-Allen committee received $3.5 million from Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen alongside contributions from physician groups and business associations. Joe Arellano, spokesperson for a committee backing Allen and opposing Kim, said business coalitions are backing Allen's regulatory approach to stabilizing California's insurance market.

Consumer Watchdog President Jamie Court and Fresno State political science professor Thomas Holyoke said the volume of outside spending underscores what is at stake for homeowners and insurers alike as the next commissioner inherits responsibility for enforcing Proposition 103 rate reviews and overseeing California's troubled property insurance market.

Sources

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought on this story.

The free newsletter

The Bay Area, in your inbox.

The local stories worth knowing, delivered once a week.

From Tri-Valley, Lamorinda, Napa Valley, Walnut Creek, and East Bay.

Get the newsletter

Free to read. Unsubscribe anytime.

More local stories